[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:29:22 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of John Regehr
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:14 AM
> To: Sean D'Epagnier
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer
>
> Many benefits of something like Diablo come from optimizing the
> application and all of its libraries together. Someone
> should figure out
> how to get this kind of benefit for AVR. I have spent a
> bunch of time
> looking at avr-gcc output over the past couple weeks and have
> seen many
> cases where better code could have been generated by
> perforing IPO on the
> application + libraries. In many cases simply propagating
> constants into
> avr-libc would get most of the benefit.
That's why I'm (desperately) hoping that the LTO project in GCC will eventually
help in this area.
<http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimization>
- [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Sean D'Epagnier, 2009/04/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, John Regehr, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer,
Weddington, Eric <=
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, John Regehr, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/20
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer, David Brown, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/20
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer, David Brown, 2009/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: avr superoptimizer, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Josef Eisl, 2009/04/20
RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, Weddington, Eric, 2009/04/20
Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr superoptimizer, John Regehr, 2009/04/20