[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:08:06 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ruud Vlaming [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 10:52 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Joerg Wunsch; address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in
>
> On Friday 30 January 2009 18:21, Weddington, Eric wrote:
>
> > > Here it is. I added some sed hocus-pocus to normalize the version
> > > numbers before comparisson. It is NOT bullit proof, but it handles
> > > one and/or two digit, possibly mixed, version numbers of
> two and/or
> > > three levels, possibly preceded by 'v' and augmented by release
> > > denotifiers.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm.
>
>
> > First off, I'm moving this thread to the avr-libc-dev list
> where it is more appropriate.
> This will be my last entry here (i am not yet receiving mail
> for the other list)
Since you are an avr-libc developer (with commit privledges) you need to
subscribe to the avr-libc-dev list.
> Please realize that this kind of approach is highly sensitive
> to the way the version
> output is generated. It breaks if one word is added in the
> string, or if version
> numbering is changed.
The patch doesn't change that one way or the other. It's just as sensitive now,
as it was before.
> Although arithmetic comparisons is
> good, string comparison
> is not necessarily worse, provided the string is well
> crafted, which is done by
> the 'sed magic' :-)
My eyes glaze over looking at those sed expressions. At least the arithmetic
comparisons I can understand fairly quickly.
> Yes i realized that when after i submitted the patch. I
> tested it on two linux distro's
> mac os and cygwin (and they run), but on a third distro it
> turns out that the declaration
> #! /bin/sh
> is not compatible with the function declaration, and should
> be changed to
> #!/bin/bash
What?! If that distro can't handle a little bit of whitespace, then I'd say
that it's broken and doesn't deserve to be supported anyway.
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug or Incorrect C ?, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/01/29
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/29
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Steven Michalske, 2009/01/29
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/29
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/01/30
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/30
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] noavr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/30
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/01/30
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/01/30
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/30
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Preston Wilson, 2009/01/30
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/30
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/01/30
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/01/30
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/30
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] no avr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/01/30
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] noavr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/30
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list]noavr/lib/avr25/attiny13a/Makefile.in, Weddington, Eric, 2009/01/30