Re: [avr-gcc-list] prog_mem limitation?

[Marc Wetzel]

> > > Is this the intended behaviour?
> > > What cause is here the trigger?
> > >       
> > I'm not eaxctly sure why they behave differently, but the
> > latter causes teststring[] to be allocated in the .data
> > section instead of .progmem. 
> >     
>
> Probably because the second case does not have the 'static' keyword?
>
> Eric
>   
Thank you all for your quick answers.   I get it now, but if you ask me: 
I don't like it.
I always saw the prog_mem keyword just like a "flash" modifier, don't 
know from where I got it (IAR maybe?).

Who would need the differentiation of   "static flash" and "flash" ;-)
But I will never forget again.

BR
Marc