Re: [avr-gcc-list] Upgraded and re-compiled a current project and a function was converted to in-line and a function.

[Joerg Wunsch]

Ray Hurst <address@hidden> wrote:

> Looking into the reason I see that the compiler generated my
> EEPROM_read function and then started generating the function
> in-line in all of the places I called it.

> Any reason for this?

We needed per-device EEPROM routines (as opposed to per-model, as it
used to be before), and since we don't have the infrastructure in
place (yet) for per-device libraries, the only way to get this was to
implement all EEPROM functions as inline code (since it's completely
contained within the header file that way).

Per-device libraries is a larger untertaking, but it appears we won't
get around that in the long run.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)