RE: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement

[Schwichtenberg, Knut]

Hi, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joerg Wunsch [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:51 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: Schwichtenberg, Knut
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Inconsisten behaviour of switch statement
> 
> Yes, but this is technically OK.  The volatile variable is read
> exactly once, and then the decision is based on the value cached in
> register rr24/25.  This is different from the behaviour you've been
> describing in the initial posting (which I'd really consider erroneous
> but could not reproduce so far).

At the meoment of reading Jörgs reply I wanted to become invisible by shame. I 
watched my original file and saw that playing around with different compares 
(if-than-else vs. switch) left the if-than-else alive and I comment-out the 
switch :-(. 

Conclusion: Monday is not my day especially after start of DST. 
 
Cheers

Knut