[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size
From: |
Erik Christiansen |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:25:19 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:50:05PM -0800, Dave Hylands wrote:
>
> Is there a different set of options I can use with 4.x to get smaller code
> size?
Does -fno-default-inline do any good?
> It seems to be inlining the putch function which is called many times,
> and the inlined version is quite a bit bigger than calling the
> function.
If the above doesn't do it, how about:
#define NOINLINE __attribute__ ((__noinline__))
on the functions that shouldn't be inlined?
(OK, that could be laborious if there are a lot of them. :-)
Erik
- [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size, Dave Hylands, 2007/03/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size,
Erik Christiansen <=
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size, Eric Weddington, 2007/03/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size, Dave Hylands, 2007/03/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/03/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size, Dave Hylands, 2007/03/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Question about code size, Joerg Wunsch, 2007/03/17