[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1
From: |
Bob Paddock |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:21:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
On Sunday 04 March 2007 14:21, Gavin Jackson wrote:
> Another thing you may want to take a look at is the SPIF
> flag on page 174 of the datasheet. It states that:
> >From what the datasheet says, your SPIF bit is never cleared
> so you'll be overwriting the SPI data register contents before
> they've been transmitted.
That code was copy&pasted verbatim right out of the CAN128
data sheet, I would not normally write code in that style. I was
doing a test on some hardware for a new board that I just powered
up for the first time and was looking for something quick. I should know better
than to trust Atmel supplied code. Sometimes I wonder
if they even bother to compile it; such as their old battery charger code
when you use something besides a Lithium battery for example.
Thanks for bring that to my attention.
- [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1, Bob Paddock, 2007/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1, Francesco Sacchi, 2007/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1, Bob Paddock, 2007/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1, Graham Davies, 2007/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1, Bob Paddock, 2007/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1, Francesco Sacchi, 2007/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1, Graham Davies, 2007/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Should this code work? 4.1.1, Dave Hansen, 2007/03/05