[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses
From: |
Ned Konz |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:34:57 -0700 |
On Apr 27, 2006, at 11:31 PM, dimax un wrote:
WOW. I will definitely study your message. It will take time to all
of us.
But my scepticism was not about templates but about writing
embedded code in C++ instead of C/Assembler/InlineAssembler.
Interesting what would you get if you would write one more example
in plain good C.
Remember too that you can combine inline assembly language macros
with C++ templates if you want.
I'm not sure about access to template parameters, etc. but it should
work AFAIK.
--
Ned Konz
MetaMagix embedded consulting
address@hidden
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR-GCC-list Digest, Vol 15, Issue 18- Device fuses, Björn Haase, 2006/04/22
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses, Ned Konz, 2006/04/22
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses, Anton Erasmus, 2006/04/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses, Ned Konz, 2006/04/25
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses, dimax un, 2006/04/25
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses, Ned Konz, 2006/04/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses, dimax un, 2006/04/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses, Dave Hylands, 2006/04/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on C macros vs. C++ templates, Ned Konz, 2006/04/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on C macros vs. C++ templates, Dave Hylands, 2006/04/28
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Device fuses,
Ned Konz <=