[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?! |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 13:59:58 +0200 (MET DST) |
"Royce Pereira" <address@hidden> wrote:
> But let's make sure that that the usage for an interruptible
> interrupt & a non-interruptible interrupt is clearly documented in
> the beginning of the topic itself, rather than buried somewhere to
> be found , as Russell Shaw said, after scanning 90% of the topic :).
OK, reasonable request. I rewrote another part of the original
description. You can have a peek at how avr-libc-1.4.0's
documentation might look like at:
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/avr-libc-user-manual/
Feedback welcome.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, User Tomdean, 2005/09/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, User Tomdean, 2005/09/03
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Russell Shaw, 2005/09/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Russell Shaw, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Vincent Trouilliez, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04