Re: [avr-gcc-list] stack layout

[Marek Michalkiewicz]

On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:01:17PM -0600, E. Weddington wrote:

> I'm not familiar with the internal details of the toolset, but I was 
> wondering: is there a particular reason why #4 has to go after all the 
> rest? Does it interfere at all with #1-#3?

Doing #3 first should make #4 easier (less work, less likely to
introduce bugs as there is one less special case to handle).
Not much else really.

Marek