[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question
From: |
Klaus Rudolph |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question |
Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2005 14:04:01 +0200 (MEST) |
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: "E. Weddington" <address@hidden>
> An: Daniel O'Connor <address@hidden>
> Kopie: address@hidden, Joerg Wunsch
> <address@hidden>
> Betreff: Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question
> Datum: Mon, 23 May 2005 05:45:14 -0600
>
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> >
> >It would be nice if some form of polymorphism happened that allowed the
> >compiler/linker to automagically pick the right function to handle a
> given
> >data type though.
> >
> >
> Sure, it's called C++. :-)
Absolutly right! It looks totally strange if you use
inline assembler in templates but this give nearly optimal output.
But never try to read it after a week again or maybe try to discuss
things on the list here. If you ever read Andrei Alexandrescu´s
"modern c++ design" you know what I mean :-)
Bye
Klaus
--
Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie!
Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
--
Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie!
Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Jeff Epler, 2005/05/23
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Trampas, 2005/05/23
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Dave Hansen, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Jeff Epler, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Russell Shaw, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Daniel O'Connor, 2005/05/23
RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Matt.VanDeWerken, 2005/05/22
[avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Haase Bjoern (PT-BEU/EMT) *, 2005/05/23
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question,
Klaus Rudolph <=