[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question (Harvard Arch and C)
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question (Harvard Arch and C) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2005 06:55:02 +0200 (MET DST) |
"stevech" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Split aka Harvard architectures are common in embedded. Although
> GCC/Winavr is contorted into supporting this via piles of macros,
> some C compilers are arranged to intrinsically support the
> architecture, i.e., having two kinds of pointers (RAM and FLASH),
> and same for constants and so on.
See my other reply, they are nevertheless violating the standard if
they place strings in ROM by default. Also, part of the hacks
required to get this running is that you need another set of functions
for ROM strings vs. RAM strings.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, James A. Kinnard, 2005/05/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Parthasaradhi Nayani, 2005/05/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Parthasaradhi Nayani, 2005/05/21
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, hanzl, 2005/05/22
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Daniel O'Connor, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, E. Weddington, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/05/23
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Trampas, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, E. Weddington, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Matthew MacClary, 2005/05/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/05/24
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Jeff Epler, 2005/05/23
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC question, Trampas, 2005/05/23