Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: WinAVR 20050214 (gcc 3.4.3) and optimizer bug.

[E. Weddington]

Russell Shaw wrote:

> Only in cases where the context may not indicate where a pointer value is
> required:
>
>   http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q5.2.html
>   http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q5.3.html
>   http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/s5.html


Thanks for the links, Russell. The first sentence in the first link:
"According to the language definition, a constant 0 in a pointer context 
is converted into a null pointer at compile time."

I wasn't aware of this. Thanks for pointing it out. :-)

Eric