[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Memory section different of .text section
From: |
Ned Konz |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Memory section different of .text section |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:59:57 -0800 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 10:24 am, Yannick PODGORSKI wrote:
> Hi,
> I saw it in gcc 3.4.2 manual, there is an example.
> I use --section-start=.function=0x1D000 and the section is well create.
>
> I use __attribute__ ((section(".function"))) in front of functions and it
> works :
> uint16_t section_fct(void); __attribute__ ((section(".function")))
> The function is well put in memory at 0x1D000
>
> I try with variables but it doesn't work :
> uint16_t var_section __attribute__ ((section(".function"))) = 0;
> The linker doesn't link :-). The error is about "section type conflict".
What happens if you make a section in RAM for the variable? I wouldn't think
that you'd be able to put a variable into flash at 0x1d000 (because then it
wouldn't be "variable", right?).
Also, I'd think it would be easier to maintain using a custom linker file
rather than using command-line settings of section addresses.
Have you tried moving the .data section using something like the command line
switch
-Wl,-Tdata,0x801100
(that, according to the avr-libc docs would move the .data section to 0x1100).
You have to add 0x800000 to the actual RAM address.
--
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
- [avr-gcc-list] PROGMEM with boot loader, Yannick PODGORSKI, 2004/11/19
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] PROGMEM with boot loader, Yannick PODGORSKI, 2004/11/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] PROGMEM with boot loader, Wolfgang Quack, 2004/11/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] PROGMEM with boot loader, Yannick PODGORSKI, 2004/11/22
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] PROGMEM with boot loader, Wolfgang Quack, 2004/11/22
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] PROGMEM with boot loader, E. Weddington, 2004/11/22
- [avr-gcc-list] Memory section different of .text section, Yannick PODGORSKI, 2004/11/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Memory section different of .text section, Yannick PODGORSKI, 2004/11/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Memory section different of .text section,
Ned Konz <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Memory section different of .text section, Yannick PODGORSKI, 2004/11/24