[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Peripheral drivers vs. WinAVR versions
From: |
Douglas Dotson |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Peripheral drivers vs. WinAVR versions |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:42:27 -0800 (PST) |
I can't seem to locate this AVRFreaks library that
you refer to. It sounds like it may be useful for the
project I am working on.
Doug
--- Peter Bozzay <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 1 year old project, made with
> WinAVR20030115 (gcc version 3.3
> 20030113 (prerelease)) and AvrFreaks id:0059 v467
> driver package.
> Everything works fine (it seems a great package),
> but now I should use
> latest WinAVR20030913 (gcc version 3.3.1) for a
> similar project, and
> the 1 wire driver doesn't work with it. Has anybody
> idea, what could
> be the problem, and the solution? Some extra
> compiler/linker/ass
> options to use or some optimization differences?
> I have built the one_wire.c with both WinAVR
> versions and it seems,
> there are many differences, as you can see it here:
>
http://snowwhite.alt.uni-miskolc.hu/~bozzay/test_winavr.zip
>
> I should be glad, if somebody can help me.
>
> Peter
> ###########################################
> Ezt a levelet az F-Secure Anti-Virus for Internet
> Mail ellenõrizte.
> Miskolci Egyetem Számítóközpont
>
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list