[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-gcc-list] RE: ATMega128 RAMPZ behaviour changed ?
From: |
Simon Eatough |
Subject: |
[avr-gcc-list] RE: ATMega128 RAMPZ behaviour changed ? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:01:34 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Hi Eric
Thanks for your reply, looking into it a bit further maybe its a compiler
problem then:-
below is listing of code.
// snip
SamplePtr is unsigned long.
alarm is at 0xc7e1
SamplePtr = &alarm;
143e8: 81 ee ldi r24, 0xE1 ; 225
143ea: 97 ec ldi r25, 0xC7 ; 199
143ec: aa 27 eor r26, r26
143ee: 97 fd sbrc r25, 7
143f0: a0 95 com r26 << breaks
here..
143f2: ba 2f mov r27, r26
143f4: 80 93 18 01 sts 0x0118, r24
143f8: 90 93 19 01 sts 0x0119, r25
143fc: a0 93 1a 01 sts 0x011A, r26
14400: b0 93 1b 01 sts 0x011B, r27
temp_value = pgm_read_byte_far(SamplePtr);
14404: ab bf out 0x3b, r26 ; 59 << RAMPZ loaded
with 0x FF here
14406: fc 01 movw r30, r24
14408: 87 91 elpm r24, Z+
1440a: 80 93 26 01 sts 0x0126, r24
// snip
GCC 3.3.1
Any comments ? cheers
Simon.
- [avr-gcc-list] RE: ATMega128 RAMPZ behaviour changed ?,
Simon Eatough <=