[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128
|
From: |
Artur Lipowski |
|
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Aug 2003 07:31:56 +0200 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of Bruce D. Lightner
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 12:19 AM
> To: Denis Chertykov; address@hidden
> Cc: E. Weddington
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128
...
> This likely explains differing behavior we saw for a large application
> moved from and AT90S8515/ATmega8515 (under avr-gcc 2.95) to the
> ATmega162L. Lowering the gcc 3.3 optimization level causes the code to
...
But this bug esits on the AT90S8515 as well.
For clearness - fact that you move from the AT90S8515/ATmega8515 to the
ATmega162L doesn't matter for that case. The key point is that you change
compiler version.
Regards,
--
Artur Lipowski
- [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128, Peter A. Zuur, 2003/08/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128, Denis Chertykov, 2003/08/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128, Bruce D. Lightner, 2003/08/07
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128,
Artur Lipowski <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128, Bruce D. Lightner (La Jolla Shores), 2003/08/08
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - taget mega128, Denis Chertykov, 2003/08/08
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - target mega128, E. Weddington, 2003/08/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - target mega128, Denis Chertykov, 2003/08/25
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR GCC Version 3.3 20030421 - target mega128, Denis Chertykov, 2003/08/27