[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:26:34 -0600 |
On 16 Apr 2003 at 15:14, Larry Barello wrote:
> avr-gcc -S -Os -fno-reorder-blocks -Wall -g -mmcu=attiny26 foo.c -o
> foo.s foo.c: In function `DoDeadBand': foo.c:21: error: unable to
> generate reloads for: (insn:QI 31 28 32 2 006B7390 (set (cc0)
> (compare (sign_extend:HI (reg/v:QI 24 r24 [42]))
> (const_int -20 [0xffffffec]))) 94 {*cmpqi_sign_extend}
> (nil)
> (nil))
> foo.c:21: internal compiler error: in find_reloads, at
> gcc/reload.c:3636
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
> make: *** [foo.s] Error 1
>
Sorry, I sent too soon.
I realize that -funsigned-char is not what you want to do for the
code (comparing signed chars), and -fsigned-char causes the compiler
ICE to show up as well.
We'll see what the latest gcc snapshot does.
Eric
- [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, Larry Barello, 2003/04/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, E. Weddington, 2003/04/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, Denis Chertykov, 2003/04/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2003/04/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, E. Weddington, 2003/04/18
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2003/04/18
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, Denis Chertykov, 2003/04/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2003/04/21
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?, E. Weddington, 2003/04/21
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Compiler bug ?,
E. Weddington <=