[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?
From: |
Brian Dean |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:36:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 12:56:13PM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> How about this one? I'm not sure whether it'll catch all occasions,
> but at least Brian's case seems to be solved with this.
>
> --- gcc/config/avr/avr.c.orig Mon Aug 12 15:13:56 2002
> +++ gcc/config/avr/avr.c Thu Aug 29 12:53:14 2002
> @@ -2711,8 +2711,8 @@
> }
> }
> else
> - return *l=2, (AS2 (st ,%0,%A1) CR_TAB
> - AS2 (std,%0+1,%B1));
> + return *l=2, (AS2 (std,%0+1,%B1) CR_TAB
> + AS2 (st ,%0,%A1));
> }
> else if (GET_CODE (base) == PLUS)
> {
I've tested your patch here and that sure seems to fix it, Joerg! I
wonder if there's any chance of getting this into the distribution?
Thanks,
-Brian
--
Brian Dean address@hidden
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?, (continued)
Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/08/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?, Brian Dean, 2002/08/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/08/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?, Brian Dean, 2002/08/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/08/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?, Brian Dean, 2002/08/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/08/31
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] possible compiler bug?,
Brian Dean <=