|
From: | Thomas D. Dean |
Subject: | Re: [avr-chat] Do people like the XMEGA? |
Date: | Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:08:57 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 02/15/13 05:14, Bob Paddock wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Rick Mann <address@hidden> wrote: Also have never fixed the bugs listed in the errata for the 128A1, instead they came out with a a different part the 128A1U, which in a regulatory environment creates a expensive paperwork nightmare if you want to switch (parts have to be as marked if audited, this is the Government logic need not apply). So start with the Xmega128A1U in any new design that you were considering using the 128A1, even if you don't need USB.
I have a device marked ATXMEGA128A1 AU. It has the same signarure, 4C 97 1E as the datasheet shows for the ATMEGA128A1U. How does one tell the difference? Tom Dean
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |