[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile
From: |
Dmitry Goncharov |
Subject: |
Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Feb 2023 16:53:43 -0500 |
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 11:41 AM Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> wrote:
> This is a GNU extension.
Not only gnu. Also supported by sun make.
> If you try this with e.g.
> OpenBSD make, it will complain.
That's why i asked those questions about portability.
Do i understand it correctly, that a need to support bmake forces
automake to abandon a good mechanism to rebuild depfiles?
regards, Dmitry
- Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/02/08
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Jan Engelhardt, 2023/02/08
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/02/09
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Jan Engelhardt, 2023/02/09
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile,
Dmitry Goncharov <=
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Jan Engelhardt, 2023/02/09
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/02/09
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Tom Tromey, 2023/02/09
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Dmitry Goncharov, 2023/02/09
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2023/02/10
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Edward Welbourne, 2023/02/10
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Bob Friesenhahn, 2023/02/10
- Re: Generating missing depfiles by an automake based makefile, Tom Tromey, 2023/02/10