Re: warning: TEST_LDFLAGS' is defined but no program or library has 'TEST' as canonical name

[Thomas Martitz]

Am 20.11.2017 um 19:01 schrieb Nick Bowler:
> Hi,
> If you were to later add a program called TEST, then the results could
> be surprising.  But you can certainly ignore the warning if you'd like.

I understand that, however we're extremely unlikely to build programs 
named in all-upper case.

> Alternately you can perhaps use a different name that does not conflict
> with the Automake naming structure.  Perhaps LDFLAGS_FOR_TEST?

Thanks,

somehow the idea of simply adding a suffix didn't occur to me, besides 
being so obvious and simple. I'll go with that.

Best regards