[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
From: |
Diego Elio Pettenò |
Subject: |
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:17:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130113 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
On 07/02/2013 16:18, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> (Side note: using AM_MAINTAINER_MODE these days is generally a bad idea
> IMHO; we should find a way to deprecate its usage in documentation, and
> eventually start warning at runtime if it is used -- and don't worry,
> with *no* plans for a later removal!)
I would argue that it would be nice to have AM_MAINTAINER_MODE([enable])
as default (and that's what I'm going to suggest on my documentation.
The reason is that while it makes total sense for developers and users
alike, it's a pain for package maintainers, as sometimes timestamps end
up mangled by patches, and we get unexpected maintainer-mode rebuilds...
especially for source-based distribution like Gentoo, we have to be wary
about maintainer mode as it would make different users end up with
different versions of the build system...
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
address@hidden — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
- Inconsistencies in boolean parameters, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2013/02/07
- Re: Inconsistencies in boolean parameters, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/07
- AM_MAINTAINER_MODE,
Diego Elio Pettenò <=
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/07
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Bob Friesenhahn, 2013/02/07
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2013/02/07
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/08
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2013/02/08
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/09
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, immanuel litzroth, 2013/02/08
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Russ Allbery, 2013/02/08
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Ineiev, 2013/02/09
- Re: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE, Russ Allbery, 2013/02/09