Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option

[Stefano Lattarini]

On 04/02/2012 05:16 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Stefano" == Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> Stefano> True, and that was even stated in the manual; the whole point
> Stefano> of ditching support for cygnus trees is that by now those two
> Stefano> big users are basically not making any real use of the 'cygnus'
> Stefano> option anymore.  To quote my previous report:
> 
> Stefano>       ./bfd/doc/Makefile.in:AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = 1.9 cygnus
> Stefano>       ./bfd/doc/Makefile.in:# cygnus option.
> Stefano>       ./bfd/doc/Makefile.am:AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = 1.9 cygnus
> Stefano>       ./bfd/doc/Makefile.am:# cygnus option.
> 
> But this is a reason not to remove it; or at least to restore the
> previous handling of info files.
>
> I don't care about the cygnus option per se.  It was always a grab bag
> of hacks.
>
And it's the hacks I'd like to remove, not the option per se :-)

> The issue is removing a feature that an important user relies on.
> So far the suggested replacements haven't seemed that good to me.
>
Sorry if I sound dense, but what exactly is the feature you are talking
about here?

Regards,
  Stefano