Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Mon Nov 29 2010 17:42:59 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• November 29, 2010
  • RE: make distclean fails for conditional nested package with VPATH build, Daily, Jeff A, 17:42
  • Re: make distclean fails for conditional nested package with VPATH build, Ralf Wildenhues, 17:33
  • make distclean fails for conditional nested package with VPATH build, Daily, Jeff A, 17:04
• November 27, 2010
  • Re: Automake and AR, NightStrike, 10:25
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, Ralf Wildenhues, 05:13
• November 26, 2010
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, xufeng zhang, 05:43
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, Stefano Lattarini, 05:38
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, xufeng zhang, 05:35
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, Stefano Lattarini, 05:26
  • Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:59
• November 25, 2010
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, xufeng zhang, 21:28
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, Dave Hart, 21:26
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, Dave Hart, 21:24
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, xufeng zhang, 21:18
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, xufeng zhang, 21:11
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, Stefano Lattarini, 17:41
• November 23, 2010
  • Re: Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, xufeng zhang, 22:38
  • Is that a way to modify tar.m4?, xufeng zhang, 22:00
  • Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, MK, 08:16
• November 22, 2010
  • Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Karl Berry, 20:42
  • Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Vincent Torri, 16:44
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Warren Young, 09:36
  • Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Ralf Wildenhues, 00:59
• November 21, 2010
  • Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, John Calcote, 23:52
  • Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Miles Bader, 21:17
  • Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Miles Bader, 21:09
  • Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Dave Hart, 18:35
  • Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, John Calcote, 17:59
  • Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), Karl Berry, 17:52
  • Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Vincent Torri, 17:44
  • Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Ralf Wildenhues, 17:27
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 17:23
  • Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Vincent Torri, 17:14
  • Re: on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:55
  • on Windows, BUILT_SOURCES does not append .exe, Vincent Torri, 16:51
  • Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), MK, 14:33
  • reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), Ralf Wildenhues, 11:44
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 10:50
  • Automake AM_COND_IF problem: libopts/Makefile.in split personality, Dave Hart, 08:10
• November 20, 2010
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Miles Bader, 20:07
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Miles Bader, 19:58
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 16:10
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:07
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 15:58
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Bob Friesenhahn, 15:21
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Bob Friesenhahn, 15:17
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 15:08
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 15:07
  • Re: another perl coverage run, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:07
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Roger Leigh, 12:31
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Paul Smith, 12:13
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 11:35
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 11:12
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Ralf Wildenhues, 10:51
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Raphael 'kena' Poss, 10:47
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 10:39
  • Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 10:27
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Russell Shaw, 10:17
  • Re: default -g ??!?, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:31
  • default -g ??!?, MK, 09:27
  • Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter, Stefano Lattarini, 08:45
  • Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:10
  • Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter, Stefano Lattarini, 07:00
  • Re: another perl coverage run, Ralf Wildenhues, 05:40
  • Re: another perl coverage run, Stefano Lattarini, 05:38
  • another perl coverage run, Ralf Wildenhues, 04:28
  • Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter, Ralf Wildenhues, 03:38
• November 19, 2010
  • Re: adding conditionally a c++ file implies static linking with g++, Vincent Torri, 18:55
  • Re: Augment instead of replace maude_DEPENDENCIES, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:40
• November 18, 2010
  • Re: Augment instead of replace maude_DEPENDENCIES, Miles Bader, 21:37
  • Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter (was: Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs), Stefano Lattarini, 15:23
  • Re: [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter (was: Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs), Nick Bowler, 15:12
  • [RFC] Docs: document silent make rules in a new chapter (was: Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs), Stefano Lattarini, 14:32
  • Re: Augment instead of replace maude_DEPENDENCIES, Eric Blake, 14:08
  • Augment instead of replace maude_DEPENDENCIES, Daily, Jeff A, 14:00
• November 17, 2010
  • Re: When "aclocal" causes an error message, "sed: invalid option -- 'q'", Eric Blake, 12:35
  • Re: When "aclocal" causes an error message, "sed: invalid option -- 'q'", Bruce Korb, 11:59
  • Re: When "aclocal" causes an error message, "sed: invalid option -- 'q'", Eric Blake, 10:35
  • Re: When "aclocal" causes an error message, "sed: invalid option -- 'q'", Bruce Korb, 10:12
  • Re: When "aclocal" causes an error message, "sed: invalid option -- 'q'", Ralf Wildenhues, 02:28
• November 16, 2010
  • Re: When "aclocal" causes an error message, "sed: invalid option -- 'q'", Bruce Korb, 16:18
  • Re: When "aclocal" causes an error message, "sed: invalid option -- 'q'", Ralf Wildenhues, 15:45
  • When "aclocal" causes an error message, "sed: invalid option -- 'q'", Bruce Korb, 15:37
• November 15, 2010
  • Re: build the same source twice with different macros, Nicolas Bock, 22:27
  • Re: build the same source twice with different macros, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:08
  • Re: build the same source twice with different macros, Steffen Dettmer, 15:25
  • Re: build the same source twice with different macros, Nick Bowler, 11:17
  • build the same source twice with different macros, Nicolas Bock, 11:12
• November 14, 2010
  • Re: [Vala] automake 1.11.1: unable to build vala project out-of-tree, Abderrahim Kitouni, 13:30
  • Re: ACLOCAL best practice, Ralf Wildenhues, 11:00
  • Re: builddir, Russell Shaw, 10:03
  • Re: User extensions, Stefano Lattarini, 09:20
  • Re: builddir, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:10
  • Re: User extensions, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:02
  • Re: User extensions, Stefano Lattarini, 07:37
• November 13, 2010
  • builddir, Russell Shaw, 20:49
  • Re: ACLOCAL best practice, Stefano Lattarini, 20:18
  • ACLOCAL best practice, Ryan Lortie, 19:38
  • Re: User extensions, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 17:40
  • Re: How to structure a GNU scientific project, Ralf Wildenhues, 05:55
• November 12, 2010
  • Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Miles Bader, 20:48
  • Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Miles Bader, 20:48
  • Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Stefano Lattarini, 15:19
  • Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:34
  • Re: [RFC] Make build and install dirs used by distcheck configurable. (was: Re: absolute build directory with spaces), Stefano Lattarini, 11:47
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 03:42
  • Re: AM_V_GEN - better docs, Miles Bader, 03:01
  • AM_V_GEN - better docs, Patrick Rutkowski, 01:32
• November 11, 2010
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:54
  • Re: Two questions: warning: macro `AM_CPPFLAGS' not found in library and how to assign values?, Joost Kraaijeveld, 13:08
  • Re: Two questions: warning: macro `AM_CPPFLAGS' not found in library and how to assign values?, Stefano Lattarini, 11:58
  • Two questions: warning: macro `AM_CPPFLAGS' not found in library and how to assign values?, Joost Kraaijeveld, 08:39
• November 10, 2010
  • Re: Silencing doxygen output, Ralf Wildenhues, 12:37
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Steffen Dettmer, 09:32
  • Re: Silencing doxygen output, Roger Leigh, 08:43
  • Silencing doxygen output, Erik de Castro Lopo, 06:45
• November 09, 2010
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 18:38
  • Re: LTFCCOMPILE and FCFLAGS_f90, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:59
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 12:54
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Bob Proulx, 12:37
  • LTFCCOMPILE and FCFLAGS_f90, Rhys Ulerich, 11:58
• November 08, 2010
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 16:41
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:37
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 16:36
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Paul Smith, 15:04
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 15:01
  • Re: execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:03
  • How to structure a GNU scientific project, Luke, 13:36
  • Re: Copy files in VPATH build, Paul Davis, 13:08
  • execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 10:55
  • Re: Copy files in VPATH build, Steffen Dettmer, 09:16
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Benjamin Bihler, 02:57
  • Re: Question about automake fails to pass the correct parameters to pax when using large UID/GID, xufeng zhang, 02:09
  • Re: Question about automake fails to pass the correct parameters to pax when using large UID/GID, Dave Hart, 02:03
  • Re: Question about automake fails to pass the correct parameters to pax when using large UID/GID, xufeng zhang, 01:53
• November 07, 2010
  • Re: [Vala] automake 1.11.1: unable to build vala project out-of-tree, Andrey Borzenkov, 23:31
  • Re: [Vala] automake 1.11.1: unable to build vala project out-of-tree, Abderrahim Kitouni, 23:31
  • automake 1.11.1: unable to build vala project out-of-tree, Andrey Borzenkov, 23:31
  • Re: adding conditionally a c++ file implies static linking with g++, Vincent Torri, 10:41
  • Re: adding conditionally a c++ file implies static linking with g++, Ralf Wildenhues, 08:50
• November 06, 2010
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Philip Herron, 14:15
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 13:07
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Paulo J. Matos, 12:37
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Paulo J. Matos, 11:56
• November 05, 2010
  • adding conditionally a c++ file implies static linking with g++, Vincent Torri, 11:57
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Benjamin Bihler, 11:29
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Benjamin Bihler, 04:27
• November 04, 2010
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:20
  • Re: [PATCH] {maint} Document in detail some limitations of aclocal. (was: Re: Strangeness with m4_include and aclocal.), Nick Bowler, 16:05
  • [PATCH] {maint} Document in detail some limitations of aclocal. (was: Re: Strangeness with m4_include and aclocal.), Stefano Lattarini, 15:48
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Dave Hart, 11:54
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Valentin David, 10:11
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Benjamin Bihler, 04:33
• November 03, 2010
  • Re: Force a file to be compiled always, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:37
  • Force a file to be compiled always, Benjamin Bihler, 05:59
• November 02, 2010
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Andrew W. Nosenko, 21:00
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Philip Herron, 12:34
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Paulo J. Matos, 09:46
  • Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support, Ian Lance Taylor, 00:30
  • Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support, Ian Lance Taylor, 00:30
• November 01, 2010
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Philip Herron, 19:26
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Paulo J. Matos, 19:20
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Paulo J. Matos, 19:15
  • Re: [coreutils] debbugs, Glenn Morris, 17:44
  • heads-up: bug-automake will be bug-tracked, Ralf Wildenhues, 17:34
  • Re: [coreutils] debbugs, Ralf Wildenhues, 17:33
  • Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:59
  • Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:36
  • Re: User extensions, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:20
  • Re: User extensions, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:18
  • Re: using autoconf with ppuxlc++,spuxlc++, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:13
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Philip Herron, 09:20
  • Re: User extensions, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 07:44
  • Re: Bison and automake together, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 06:08

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc