[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests"
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests" |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:39:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
Hello Ralf.
On Wednesday 18 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I suppose automake could be enhanced to also define $(OBJECTS) as
> the set of all objects.
What about libtool objects? Should we care about them? I'm writing a
couple of (xfailing) testcases to check a prospective patch introducing
$(OBJECTS) (BTW, is such a general name enough namespace-safe? I hardly
think so...), and I don't know what to do for libtool objects.
Regards,
Stefano
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", (continued)
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", Roberto Bagnara, 2010/08/18
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/18
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", Roberto Bagnara, 2010/08/18
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/18
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/18
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", Roberto Bagnara, 2010/08/19
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests",
Stefano Lattarini <=
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/19
- Re: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests", Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/19
- [PATCHES] Docs on automatic dependency tracking (was: Testing a new compiler with Automake "simple tests"), Stefano Lattarini, 2010/08/17