[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dist-xz compression level
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: dist-xz compression level |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:05:11 +0200 |
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> the newly added dist-xz target produce worse compressed archives
> than lzma-dist. The reason is that automake call lzma with
> best compression while it won't use -9 level for xz.
> Is this intention or bug?
It was deliberate.
For my use, xz -9 is far too slow for anything except the
final "make dist" I run just prior to a release.
For a release, I run this, via one of the
alpha, beta or stable targets in gnulib's maint.mk:
$(MAKE) dist XZ_OPT=-9ev
- Re: dist-xz compression level, (continued)
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Andreas Jellinghaus, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Reuben Thomas, 2010/04/12
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Andreas Jellinghaus, 2010/04/12
Re: dist-xz compression level,
Jim Meyering <=
Re: dist-xz compression level, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/04/12