[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Distributed files: licenses
From: |
NightStrike |
Subject: |
Distributed files: licenses |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:18:07 -0500 |
Right now, we distribute license files in the source archives by
adding them to the EXTRA_DIST variable.
We do not, however, include the license files in tarballs that we make
and distribute of the BINARY archives. I know automake has a lot
ofrules and stuff detailing how to build and package source archives,
but I don't see much convention on doing so with binary archives.
Right now, our project (http://mingw-w64.sf.net/) builds and
distributes complete GCC toolchains using our header set and crt.
This includes, of course, building and distributing our own project as
a part of it all. Should we include license files with that? We have
received this feature request:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=983357&aid=2944821&group_id=202880
What is the convention held by the typical project out there? I know
nothing about licenses, nor how to actually handle them. All insight
is greatly appreciated.
- Distributed files: licenses,
NightStrike <=