[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: silent-rules
From: |
Richard Ash |
Subject: |
Re: silent-rules |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:17:31 +0100 |
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 03:17 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > But YOU can still disable it by default, by writing your packaging
> > automation tools to supply --disable-silent-rules as part of calling
> > ./configure, and/or writing an appropriate config.site. In other words,
> > the person running ./configure STILL has the option to choose YOUR desired
> > default, even if it is different than the package author's desired
> > default.
>
> Exactly what I said in a previous mail: Automake is pushing around
> package maintainers to modify their packages to automake's behavioral
> changes. (Here package maintainer == Package installers)
Or use the config.site mechanism as part of the build environment, which
means no change to the packaging automation tools, just an addition to
the build environment (which I assume you have to standardise anyway).
Richard
- silent-rules (was: checking automake version in configure.ac), Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/06
- Re: silent-rules, Ralf Corsepius, 2009/10/13
- Re: silent-rules, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/10/13
- Re: silent-rules, Ralf Corsepius, 2009/10/13
- Re: silent-rules, Eric Blake, 2009/10/13
- Re: silent-rules, Ralf Corsepius, 2009/10/13
- Re: silent-rules,
Richard Ash <=
- Re: silent-rules, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/14
- Re: silent-rules, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/10/14
- Re: silent-rules, Ralf Corsepius, 2009/10/15
- Re: silent-rules, Yavor Doganov, 2009/10/15
- Re: silent-rules, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/10/15
- Re: silent-rules, Ralf Corsepius, 2009/10/14
- Re: silent-rules, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/10/15