Re: Setting shared lib version not functioning

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Sunday 2009-05-03 20:40, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
>
>What I did to the library was add several procedures

That in itself would cause a bump in the 'current' number to 3.

>but the original 
>functions were not changed nor affected.

So 'age' becomes 1, since you are still supporting (3-1) = 2.

>You all seem to be indicating that "age" is superfluous.

Not at all.