[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] build: use automake's --silent-rules option when possible
From: |
Alberto Luaces |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] build: use automake's --silent-rules option when possible |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:45:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
El Sábado 28 Marzo 2009ES 17:14:10 Jan Engelhardt escribió:
> On Saturday 2009-03-28 16:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >Hi Bob, Jim,
> >
> >* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:40:16PM CET:
> >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >>> I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules option enough
> >>> that I'm making it the default (when possible) for coreutils.
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>> CC id.o
> >>
> >> What happens when things go wrong with the compilation command line? How
> >> will the user diagnose build problems in this Linux-kernel like mode?
> >
> >Use 'make V=1'.
>
> Which — I might add — is vastly better than cmake mentioned in
> previous discussions, which, as far as my knowledge goes, you have to
> rerun cmake and recreate Makefiles (gagh!).
No, cmake doesn't regenerate the Makefiles if you use make VERBOSE=1:
$ ls -l Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 alberto alberto 123740 mar 20 17:02 Makefile
$ make
[Compilation interrupted with CTRL-C]
$make VERBOSE=1
[Verbose ouput, compilation interrupted with CTRL-C]
$ ls -l Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 alberto alberto 123740 mar 20 17:02 Makefile