[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:41:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
* K. Richard Pixley wrote on Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 09:21:53PM CEST:
> Harlan Stenn wrote:
> >I agree with Ralf - can you demonstrate an example of the problem you
> >are trying to solve?
> >
> I've already described the use case twice. And the response seems to be
> that automake doesn't support those use cases.
No. My response was that you first haven't given a precise bug report,
second that even your use cases as I understood them should work, and
that if they don't then I would like to be able to reproduce it.
Describing a use case isn't a bug report. Please include at least the
failing command and all of its output verbatim (cut and paste). Keep in
mind that there may be a genuine bug that you have hit that we may not
know about yet.
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, (continued)
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, Benoit Sigoure, 2007/06/19
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, K. Richard Pixley, 2007/06/19
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, K. Richard Pixley, 2007/06/19
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, Harlan Stenn, 2007/06/19
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, K. Richard Pixley, 2007/06/19
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, Harlan Stenn, 2007/06/19
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, K. Richard Pixley, 2007/06/19
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, Harlan Stenn, 2007/06/19
- Re: Automake violations of the gnu coding conventions, K. Richard Pixley, 2007/06/19