[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:10:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello Alexandre,
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:54:31AM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> > [..] aclocal could output some code in
> > aclocal.m4 to ensure that the autoconf version that reads
> > aclocal.m4 is the same as the version that was traced to
> > generate it.
...
> > In case this check doesn't sound appropriate for
> > non-automake-based package, [...]
I believe that this check is good for all packages using aclocal.
So it would be better if the check would not depend on AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.
Could the check be executed directly in aclocal.m4, so that it wouldn't be
part of any macro definition? Is that what you meant?
(I second Noah's excitement about this. Thanks!)
Have a nice day,
Stepan
Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/04/13
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Noah Misch, 2006/04/13
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/04/13
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/04/13
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Stepan Kasal, 2006/04/14
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Paul Eggert, 2006/04/14
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/04/16
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Stepan Kasal, 2006/04/16
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Noah Misch, 2006/04/16
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Bob Proulx, 2006/04/18
- Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Noah Misch, 2006/04/18
Re: Broken makefile given Autoconf version mismatch, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2006/04/20