[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cover Texts in the automake documentation
From: |
Eric Dorland |
Subject: |
Re: Cover Texts in the automake documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:30:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 |
* Ben Pfaff (address@hidden) wrote:
> Eric Dorland <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > * Alexandre Duret-Lutz (address@hidden) wrote:
> >>
> >> Eric:
> >> | Is there any way you might consider dropping the
> >> | Front and Back Cover Texts requirements from the manual?
> >>
> >> Sorry, this is the FSF policy. Not my call.
> >
> > Could you please point out where the FSF have made this policy?
>
> http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#License-Notices
>
> Documentation files should have license notices also. Manuals
> should use the GNU Free Documentation License. Here is an example
> of the license notice to use after the copyright notice. Please
> adjust the list of invariant sections as appropriate for your
> manual. (If there are none, then say with no invariant sections.)
> See GNU Sample Texts, for a full example in a Texinfo manual.
>
> Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
> document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation
> License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the
> Free Software Foundation; with the Invariant Sections being
> "GNU General Public License", with the Front-Cover Texts
> being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
> (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section
> entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
>
> (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You are free to copy
> and modify this GNU Manual. Buying copies from GNU
> Press supports the FSF in developing GNU and promoting
> software freedom.''
>
> If the FSF does not publish this manual on paper, then omit the
> last sentence in (a) that talks about copies from GNU Press. If
> the FSF is not the copyright holder, then replace FSF with the
> appropriate name.
Darn. That is a *should* and not a *must*. But I'm guessing that since
the copyright holder is listed as the FSF, getting this changed will
basically be impossible. *Sigh*. Ok, time to pull this sucker apart.
--
Eric Dorland <address@hidden>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: address@hidden
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+
G e h! r- y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature