[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Patch] Re: compile not copied? Why?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [Patch] Re: compile not copied? Why? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:34:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi Harald,
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:00:18PM CET:
> Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> > What is the criteria for copying the compile script into
> > the source directory tree? I have some *.cc code, it is
> > mentioned in my Makefile.am file, configure detects that
> > the compile script must be used, too, but Automake doesn't
> > provide it.
>
> It seems that the compile script is only copied, if you have
> C code only. As soon as you have C++ code in your Makefile.am
> (with or without C code), compile is not copied into the
> source tree anymore. This breaks support for MSVC.
>
> Below you can find a patch.
Please consider this thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-10/msg00069.html
Cheers,
Ralf
- compile not copied? Why?, Harald Dunkel, 2005/11/07
- Re: compile not copied? Why?, Tom Tromey, 2005/11/12
- [Patch] Re: compile not copied? Why?, Harald Dunkel, 2005/11/13
- Re: [Patch] Re: compile not copied? Why?,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: [Patch] Re: compile not copied? Why?, Harald Dunkel, 2005/11/13
- Re: compile not copied? Why?, n.g., 2005/11/14
- useful bug reports (was: [Patch] Re: compile not copied? Why?), Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/11/14
- Re: useful bug reports, Harald Dunkel, 2005/11/15
- Re: useful bug reports, Harald Dunkel, 2005/11/15
- Re: useful bug reports, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/11/15
- Re: useful bug reports, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/11/15
- Re: useful bug reports, Harald Dunkel, 2005/11/16
- autotools support for msvc (was: useful bug reports), Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/11/16
- Re: autotools support for msvc, Harald Dunkel, 2005/11/18