[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disabling optimization
From: |
Braden McDaniel |
Subject: |
Re: Disabling optimization |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:45:00 -0500 |
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 14:04 +0100, Stepan Kasal wrote:
[snip]
> But my question was whether there was a reason for setting the variable
> _after_ AC_PROG_CXX, as the original suggestion proposed.
In retrospect, I can't think of one.
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail: <address@hidden>
<http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <address@hidden>
- Re: Disabling optimization, (continued)
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, jfasch, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, jfasch, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Thomas Dickey, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Stepan Kasal, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization,
Braden McDaniel <=