[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool verbosity
|
From: |
Albert Chin |
|
Subject: |
Re: libtool verbosity |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 May 2004 16:12:06 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 11:24:49AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2004, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> > I was expecting this sort of answer, but was hoping that then I would
> > also get a pointer to how else to possibly achieve the same thing.
>
> For the package I support, I added a configure option to enable
> verbose libtool output. Libtool is executed in silent mode by default
> since it is assumed that maintainers/porters are the only ones who
> really need the extra information.
Why would anyone want silent output? Surely someone building your tool
would be interested in errors during a build, rather than rebuilding
from scratch to find out what went wrong?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)