Re: html texinfo install?

[Alexandre Duret-Lutz]

[Eric I don't think you really meant to conceal this from Karl
and Patrice, so I've added the Cc: back.  Please be careful not
to drop it.]

>>> "Eric" == Eric Siegerman <address@hidden> writes:

 Eric> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:19:05PM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
[...]
 >> Yeah!  That's the idea!  Type in, ``make html'' and any html-making
 >> gets triggered, whether it is texinfo based or not.  :-)

 Eric> Or, indeed, whether part is texinfo-based *and* part not.  Of
 Eric> course, the target for making the texinfo-based subset of the
 Eric> HTML might indeed be "texinfohtml", and correspondingly for
 Eric> install and uninstall.  But that should be purely a detail of
 Eric> automake's implementation:
 Eric> html:  texinfohtml  whatever_other_html_targets_make_sense

 Eric> It need not, and IMO should not, be mentioned in the coding
 Eric> standards.

This makes sense to me.  

`make html' is not a problem.  However if `make install-html'
and `make uninstall-html' are introduced and must (as we all
expect) install more than just makeinfo-generated files, then
the GNU Coding Standards should also define a destination
directory for these other files.  Something like $htmldir.
-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz