[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake -vs- huge projects
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: automake -vs- huge projects |
Date: |
16 Dec 2003 18:41:49 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
>>>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:
adl> Furthermore, generally it does not work to compile both the .o
adl> and .lo objects of a source file (in the last example Automake
adl> is expected to warn that these files are being built both with
adl> and without Libtool), so it sounds safe to remove the rules
adl> which are not used.
This would be a great change, but unfortunately it only gets us down
to 3M, which is still about 6x too large.
Tom
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, (continued)
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/16
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects,
Tom Tromey <=
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 2003/12/16
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/17
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Tom Tromey, 2003/12/30
- mailing list archives (Was: Re: automake -vs- huge projects), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/30
- Re: mailing list archives (Was: Re: automake -vs- huge projects), Thomas Dickey, 2003/12/30
- Re: mailing list archives, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/30
Message not availableRe: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/27
Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/30
Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/30