[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Desired feature
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: Desired feature |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 08:49:04 +0000 |
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:24:11 -0600 (CST), "Bob Friesenhahn"
<address@hidden> said:
> It would be useful if Automake supported a set of options (e.g.
> LDFLAGS) which are applied only when building libraries or when
> building programs. It is excessively painful to have to add
> per-target _LDFLAGS options. Perhaps there should be both 'LT' and
> non-'LT' macro versions.
>
> Certainly this can be accomplished by overriding Automake's standard
> LINK and COMPILE definitions, but overriding standard definitions is
> risky.
Seconded!
It would be great to have `LT_LDFLAGS = -module', rather than 15 lines of
`foo_LDFLAGS = -module' in a future m4 Makefile.am :-)
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
- Desired feature, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/12/03
- Re: Desired feature,
Gary V. Vaughan <=