Re: convenience binaries

[Robert Collins]

On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 22:31, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:01:24PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 21:22, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > > Robert Collins wrote:
> > > > yes,
> > > > noinst_PROGRAMS = convenience_binaries
> > > 
> > > Can these convenience programs be built for the host arch in a
> > > cross-compiled environment?
> > 
> > probably, you'll likely need to override the default build recipe
> > though.. I haven't tried, perhaps someone else here has more details.
> 
> Can it ever be correct for a noinst object to be built for the target
> environment? By definition, they should only exist on the build
> system.

Not necessarily - but certainly the common case is for them to be build
system only.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.