[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Installed vs built library
From: |
Luigi Ballabio |
Subject: |
Installed vs built library |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:23:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.0 (I'm Being Nibbled to Death by Cats!) |
Hi all,
it's probably something stupid I'm doing. However,
here's the problem. Inside a project I'm building a shared
library in a sub-directory and a test-suite executable in
another. The related lines of the respective Makefile.am are
lib_LTLIBRARIES = libFoo.la
and
bin_PROGRAMS = foo-test-suite
foo_test_suite_LDADD = ../lib/libFoo.la
TESTS = foo-test-suite
Now, if I don't have a previous version of libFoo installed,
make && make check works fine. However, if this is not the case,
running 'make check' causes the installed library to be loaded
rather than the newly-built one.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Luigi
P.S. Almost forgetting: libtool 1.4.3, automake 1.7.6,
autoconf 2.57
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Installed vs built library,
Luigi Ballabio <=