[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building .so files only.
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: Building .so files only. |
Date: |
28 Aug 2003 02:12:27 +0100 |
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 00:49, Stephen Torri wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 01:50, Schleicher Ralph (LLI) wrote:
> >
> ! If the @samp{-static} option is given, then only a @samp{.o} file is
> ! built, even if libtool was configured with @samp{--disable-static}.
>
> This sounds logically confusing. What is the point of --disable-static
> if -static overrides it?
>
Because otherwise what would libtool's reaction to being passed
--disable-static at configure-time and -static at compile time be?
+ libtool -mode=compile -static...
libtool sits down and starts singing about gold...
?
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: Building .so files only., Schleicher Ralph (LLI), 2003/08/29
RE: Building .so files only., Schleicher Ralph (LLI), 2003/08/29