[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:45:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) XEmacs/21.1 (patch 12) (Channel Islands) (i386--freebsd) |
In this case, the subdir is another auto* package.
I *could* solve this by passing an argument to distcheck's "configure" , but
I didn't see how to do that, either.
Is there a way to pass configure options to distcheck's "configure" run?
H
--
> Hi,
>
> Harlan Stenn <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I have a subroutine that is only conditionally built.
> >
> > I have listed this subroutine in DIST_SUBDIRS, as that's where I
> > gather the list of subdirs that must be in a distribution but might
> > not be built are specified.
> >
> > With 1.7.6, distcheck now fails as it tries to "cd" to this
> > directory inside the =build/ subdir.
>
> The directory and Makefile should exist, even if it isn't used.
> You cannot disable generation of the Makefile in your configure.ac.
>
> > Is this a bug in 1.7.6 or do I have to solve this another way?
>
> A rule of thumb is that every Makefile.am should have a corresponding
> *unconditional* AC_CONFIG_FILES entry in your configure.ac. The
> directories and Makefiles should be created even if nothing in them
> is built.
>
> - Hari
> --
> Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ address@hidden
- 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck, Harlan Stenn, 2003/08/13
- Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck, Raja R Harinath, 2003/08/13
- Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck,
Harlan Stenn <=
- Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/08/14
- Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck, Harlan Stenn, 2003/08/16
- Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/08/17
- Re: 1.7.6, DIST_SUBDIRS, and distcheck, Eric Siegerman, 2003/08/22