[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake and (f)lex
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: automake and (f)lex |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:02:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Simon Waters wrote:
> Couldn't figure out why automake was including the ".c" file for the lex
> code when doing "make dist".
>
> Eventually read the manual ;-) Which said this is what it is suppose to do.
>
> Since the generated C code isn't portable it breaks the normal
> "./configure; make" build procedure on one of the target platforms.
>
> Evil hacks are easy to avoid this, but why does it do this, and is there
> a "right way" of stopping it, or should I do something clever to make
> the generated C portable?
Recent versions of flex are a dead loss; I'd stick with 2.5.4 until
the flex maintainers start responding to mail, or at least fixing
bugs.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
pgpMhRPNDNZCU.pgp
Description: PGP signature