Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat May 31 2003 21:53:38 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• May 31, 2003
  • Inanilmaz Fiyatlarla Web Tasarim Kampanyasi ! !, Studio Web Hizmetleri, 21:53
• May 30, 2003
  • Re: SDL, automake, autoconf, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:51
  • PATCH: Alllow toplevel to be three subdirectories away, Kelley Cook, 11:17
• May 29, 2003
  • Automake include archive, Tom Howard, 23:11
  • Re: SDL, automake, autoconf, Assar Westerlund, 17:50
  • Re: Way to install only shared libraries, Assar Westerlund, 17:14
  • Re: automake is confused by its dependencies files, Assar Westerlund, 15:32
  • Way to install only shared libraries, Stephen Torri, 11:25
• May 28, 2003
  • RE: Reserved. (KMM44949775V73609L0KM), address@hidden, 22:02
  • Geschaeftsidee, Silvia_Barbosa, 19:48
  • Re: About make install, Simon Richter, 17:00
  • About make install, David Gómez, 16:43
• May 27, 2003
  • SDL, automake, autoconf, Mattias Brändström, 11:13
  • automake is confused by its dependencies files, Ehud Shabtai, 09:12
  • Die Geschaeftsidee, Laura.DaSilva, 00:10
• May 26, 2003
  • Ihre Mail an address@hidden, autoresponder, 12:09
• May 25, 2003
  • GCC Bootstrap failure after upgrading Autoconf and Automake, Joseph D. Wagner, 14:34
• May 22, 2003
  • Re: I can't set up Makefile.am for data directory & avoid 'No rule, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 13:30
  • Re: Building a number of small shared modules, Joshua Kwan, 13:13
  • Re: Building a number of small shared modules, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 13:06
  • Re: What is easiest way to add extra command to Makefile that gets run *always*?, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 12:59
  • Re: stamp-h1, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 12:47
  • Re: What is easiest way to add extra command to Makefile that gets run *always*?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 12:28
  • Geschaeftsgelegenheit!!!, Monika von Stetten, 08:19
  • stop, Daniel Bengtsson, 06:24
  • Re: What is easiest way to add extra command to Makefile that gets run *always*?, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak, 04:45
• May 21, 2003
  • Civil Engineering Quiz, CQ Manager, 14:25
  • stamp-h1, Bob Lockie, 01:46
• May 20, 2003
  • HOW ARE YOU, Mrs Victoria Guei., 22:12
  • What is easiest way to add extra command to Makefile that gets run *always*?, cs, 15:56
  • [no subject], cs, 13:10
  • Announce: Confix 1.2.0 released, Joerg Faschingbauer, 07:41
• May 19, 2003
  • Building a number of small shared modules, Joshua Kwan, 22:14
  • AC_CHECK_HEADERS not working for me., Jose Roman Bilbao, 13:03
  • Problem with installation, Shailaja Ranganna, 04:17
  • Re: My details, support, 00:49
• May 18, 2003
  • urgent, femi_koko, 12:16
  • Automake 1.7.5 released, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:10
• May 15, 2003
  • Re: SUFFIXES, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:18
  • Re: How add a directory to source tree that used Autoconf but NOT Automake?!.., Eric Siegerman, 13:43
  • ELearnChina Conference 2003, Edwin Jones, 07:19
  • SUFFIXES, Bill Moseley, 01:45
• May 14, 2003
  • Re: Major differences between Autotools versions on Red Hat 7.3 and 8.0??? Seems so..., Eric Siegerman, 14:59
  • Re: AC_CHECK_LIB not substituting LDFLAGS, Steve M. Robbins, 09:13
  • AC_CHECK_LIB not substituting LDFLAGS, Jose Roman Bilbao, 05:32
  • Re: stat & snprintf replacements?, Jim Meyering, 05:03
  • dfdfd, dfd, 01:11
• May 13, 2003
  • Major differences between Autotools versions on Red Hat 7.3 and 8.0??? Seems so..., cs, 20:15
  • Re: Why CFLAGS works but not name_CFLAGS sometimes?, cs, 20:13
  • How add a directory to source tree that used Autoconf but NOT Automake?!.., cs, 16:09
• May 12, 2003
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:31
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Raja R Harinath, 18:26
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:08
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Eric Siegerman, 17:38
  • Re: I can't set up Makefile.am for data directory & avoid 'No rule, cs, 16:48
  • Re: How/Why $(distdir) missing??--> No rule to make target, cs, 16:44
• May 11, 2003
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Raja R Harinath, 18:20
  • Re: Problem with shared librairies and linking, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:57
  • Re: Using directory variables in programs, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:49
  • Re: How/Why $(distdir) missing??--> No rule to make target 'distdir'. Stop, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:44
  • Re: replacement function library for autoconf checks, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:41
  • Re: autoconf automake and aclocal, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:38
  • Re: Running a plain ./config.status at top level, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:33
  • Re: I can't set up Makefile.am for data directory & avoid "No rule to make target `all'."..., Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:17
  • How to pass non regular paths to ./configure?, Jose Roman Bilbao, 16:01
  • Re: AM_CPPFLAGS vs. [lib]_CPPFLAGS, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:01
• May 10, 2003
  • Source code in two directories -- one shared library, Robin Rowe, 18:44
• May 09, 2003
  • Re: Problem with shared librairies and linking, Dale E Martin, 13:23
  • Problem with shared librairies and linking, Antoine Duval, 12:53
  • Re: stat & snprintf replacements?, Lars Hecking, 11:03
  • stat & snprintf replacements?, Derek Robert Price, 10:42
  • Re: Anyone installing Perl modules?, Russ Allbery, 10:14
  • Contra Factos....., Jorge T, 08:14
  • Re: Anyone installing Perl modules?, Lars Hecking, 04:25
  • Re: Anyone installing Perl modules?, Bill Moseley, 01:02
• May 08, 2003
  • Re: Anyone installing Perl modules?, Eric Siegerman, 15:17
  • Anyone installing Perl modules?, Bill Moseley, 15:06
  • Re: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Tim Mooney, 14:16
  • Re: Why CFLAGS works but not name_CFLAGS sometimes?, Sander Niemeijer, 10:27
  • Re: Dynamic libtool library too small?, Dale E Martin, 05:06
• May 07, 2003
  • Dynamic libtool library too small?, Jose Roman Bilbao, 22:33
  • Re: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Charles Wilson, 21:02
  • RE: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Tim Mooney, 13:18
  • Regarding my last message about lib size, Jose Roman Bilbao, 10:15
  • RE: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Philip Graham Willoughby, 09:19
  • Re: Changing library does *not* always cause executable to beremade with "make"!?!?.., zaufi, 09:09
  • [automake] windows installer support, Dalibor Topic, 07:49
  • install dependencies are ignored, Philip Graham Willoughby, 07:30
  • RE: aclocal search path and multiple versions of libtool (none installed in same prefix as automake), Philip Graham Willoughby, 07:23
  • Re: make -j and touching configure.in, with automake, Akim Demaille, 06:39
  • Re: Changing library does *not* always cause executable to beremade with "make"!?!?.., Guido Draheim, 05:46
  • Re: Changing library does *not* always cause executable to be remade with "make"!?!?.., zaufi, 05:10
  • Changing library does *not* always cause executable to be remade with "make"!?!?.., cs, 02:26
• May 06, 2003
  • Minor fix, Simon Richter, 16:20
  • Using directory variables in programs, Dalibor Topic, 05:35
  • Why CFLAGS works but not name_CFLAGS sometimes?, cs, 01:24
• May 05, 2003
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 19:56
  • How port over package made with ancient Automake version??...and remove all errors?, cs, 17:34
  • How/Why $(distdir) missing??--> No rule to make target 'distdir'. Stop, cs, 16:51
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 15:03
  • Re: creating 1 library from all noinst libraries in subdirs, Bob Proulx, 13:01
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 10:53
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Jim Meyering, 10:47
  • Re: creating 1 library from all noinst libraries in subdirs, Schleicher Ralph (LLI), 10:29
  • Re: creating 1 library from all noinst libraries in subdirs, Bob Rossi, 07:53
  • Re: Status of Java support and Guile conversion?, Simon Richter, 07:32
  • new sweater styles publish-011, lolita, 07:25
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 05:54
  • Re: automake -a behavior, Sander Niemeijer, 04:34
  • Re: creating 1 library from all noinst libraries in subdirs, Schleicher Ralph (LLI), 02:21
• May 04, 2003
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 23:29
  • Re: Status of Java support and Guile conversion?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 21:38
  • Status of Java support and Guile conversion?, Roland Besserer, 19:59
  • Re: Spurious rebuilds, craig . howard, 19:19
  • Re: Spurious rebuilds, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 18:12
  • Re: Problem with automake 1.7.2, Christoph Egger, 18:00
  • Re: INSTALL_DATA and modes, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:51
  • Re: automake -a behavior, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:50
  • Re: Problem with automake 1.7.2, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:47
  • Re: problem with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS and automake, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:43
  • Re: problem with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS and automake, Guido Draheim, 10:22
  • Re: problem with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS and automake, Dale E Martin, 09:54
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 07:58
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Thomas E. Dickey, 07:18
  • Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 01:53
• May 03, 2003
  • Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 19:59
  • Re: problem with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS and automake, Guido Draheim, 12:56
  • Re: problem with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS and automake, Dale E Martin, 11:25
  • Re: problem with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS and automake, Guido Draheim, 10:59
  • problem with AC_CONFIG_HEADERS and automake, Dale E Martin, 09:22
  • Re: Getting 'undefined reference' errors during linking but I thinkI included all libraries?!?, Steve M. Robbins, 08:28
  • Spurious rebuilds, craig . howard, 02:00
• May 02, 2003
  • Re: When linking, why -L's *must* come before -l's??? Why -l's can come before function calls?!!, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 18:02
  • Re: Getting 'undefined reference' errors during linking but I think I included all libraries?!?, Eric Siegerman, 15:08
  • When linking, why -L's *must* come before -l's??? Why -l's can come before function calls?!!, cs, 14:32
  • Re: Getting 'undefined reference' errors during linking but I think I included all libraries?!?, cs, 13:49
  • Re: Getting 'undefined reference' errors during linking but I think I included all libraries?!?, cs, 11:57
  • Re: Getting 'undefined reference' errors during linking but I think I included all libraries?!?, Dale E Martin, 07:19
  • Re: Getting 'undefined reference' errors during linking but I think I included all libraries?!?, Rusty Ballinger, 04:09
  • Re: Getting 'undefined reference' errors during linking but I think I included all libraries?!?, cs, 00:42
• May 01, 2003
  • Re: Getting "undefined reference" errors during linking but I think I included all libraries?!?, Rusty Ballinger, 16:59
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, cs, 15:39
  • Re: What *target* use for non-source files want to add to package like DATA?, Bob Proulx, 12:33

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc