[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?
From: |
cs |
Subject: |
Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:53:50 -0700 (MST) |
For "convenience libraries" I just successfully
used LDADD. It looks like LIBADD would also have
worked which uses LIBTOOL.....
I think LDADD is only for stuff you will *link*
with executable and LIBADD is more powerful and used
for other things like making real libraries you really
intend to install on system.
If true, wouldn't it be a good idea to get in habit
of using LIBADD (and Libtool) for everything?
i.e.
Why use 2 commands if 1 does both functions?
Chris
- Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?,
cs <=