[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake & flex's -P option
From: |
Richard Dawe |
Subject: |
Re: automake & flex's -P option |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:02:25 +0000 |
Hello.
Akim Demaille wrote:
[snip]
> I think a lot could be done to improve the interface provided that we
> require Bison and Flex. The problem here stems on the willingness to
> be yacc/lex portable.
[snip]
Out of interest: Is it a hard requirement that automake should work with lex,
yacc rather than requiring flex, bison? Or is it likely to change in the
future?
Thanks, bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
- automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/03
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Akim Demaille, 2003/03/13
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/17
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/03/17
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Akim Demaille, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option,
Richard Dawe <=
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Earnie Boyd, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18