[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linking in C++ mode
From: |
Ralf Corsepius |
Subject: |
Re: Linking in C++ mode |
Date: |
11 Nov 2002 05:37:30 +0100 |
Am Mon, 2002-11-11 um 00.50 schrieb Earnie Boyd:
> John Levon wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 01:01:08PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>You could always just add -lstdc++ to the oprofiled_LDADD variable.
> >>
> >>This would be a fault, IMO.
> >
>
> Why?
Because linking c++ is more than adding -lstdc++.
> > I do not think getting gcc to link -lstdc++ is a good idea either, but
> > it doesn't have much more hack value than the solution you propose below
> > IMHO.
> >
>
> It's the hack that using g++ performs.
... no. Using g++ for linking performs other g++-internal tasks, such as
composing ctors/dtors lists for static constructors and to pull in
further (g++-internal) libraries into linking (cf. collect2 in newer
gcc's).
What it exactly does is highly target- and gcc-version depending. It can
boil down to "just adding -lstdc++", but in most cases it will perform
more.
Ralf
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, (continued)
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, Earnie Boyd, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, Ralf Corsepius, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, John Levon, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, Pierre Sarrazin, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, John Levon, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, Pierre Sarrazin, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, John Levon, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, Pierre Sarrazin, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, Earnie Boyd, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, John Levon, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode,
Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, Ralf Corsepius, 2002/11/10
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, John Levon, 2002/11/11
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/11/14
- Re: Linking in C++ mode, John Levon, 2002/11/14