[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spam
From: |
Justin Kirby |
Subject: |
Re: spam |
Date: |
14 May 2002 18:34:25 -0400 |
I recently subscribed to this list, because of some issues I was
having... (figured it out without have to post I think)...
But I would like to interject my $0.02 in this...
I am subscribed to a TON of lists, all of them require you to subscribe
in order to post. This is generally considered a core feature of lists.
One notable exception is the cvshome.org lists, and I am no longer
subscribed to those.
I am sorry, but "Have hot sex tonight" and "Viagra overnight" are just
unacceptable and diminish the quality of a community. If the list
manager program can not place the simple requirement of a subscription
in order to post, then it needs to be thrown out and a new one put in
place.
And no I should not be required to place a bazillion filters in my email
program in order to not get this cruft.
just my $0.02
Justin
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 17:59, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [Sorry for offtopic, but since Christoph wants to discuss this in the
> list, I don't want readers to see only his replies, but not mine]
>
> > proski> Install a spam filter. I use SpamAssassin. You can download it
> > from
> > proski> http://spamassassin.org/
> >
> > Not everybody has the possibility to install a filter (i am not the system
> > administrator)
>
> SpamAssassin can be installed with user permissions and used from
> procmail. Read the documentation.
>
> My configuration: fetchcmail gets mail and uses procmail as MDA (mail
> delivery agent). procmail sorts some mailing lists first - I don't want
> it to remove spam from the lists I administer, because this would hide my
> failures. It also passes e-mail from known people - if a spammer
> impersonates them or they get a virus, I want to know that.
>
> Then SpamAssassin checks for spam. The spam goes to a separate folder for
> review and reporting to spamcop.net. Then my (old, pre-SA) filters are
> used. It's useful to separate HTML e-mail and e-mail with no subject from
> mailing lists - such posts are usually clueless and don't deserve to be
> archived, not to mention MS Word attachments. Finally, the messages are
> put to the mailing list folders, and the remainder goes to the inbox.
>
> > IMO it would help a lot, if only people were allowed to send messages to
> > address@hidden, who subscribed to the list. No full time administrator
> > is needed, in fact it would be easy to implement.
>
> It's already implemented in Mailman, it's just turned off. However, it
> would be wrong to reject such messages withot review, and that takes time.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Pavel Roskin
>
>
--
JID: address@hidden
,/^^^^\,
/ \\.
/|
/| /''\___/
/''\__/ |/
/''\__/ |/
\\ ./
`\..../
http://www.openaether.org
- spam, christoph.wiedemann, 2002/05/13
- Re: spam, christoph.wiedemann, 2002/05/14
- Re: spam, Skip Montanaro, 2002/05/14
- Re: spam, Pavel Roskin, 2002/05/14
- Re: spam,
Justin Kirby <=
- RE: spam, Dan Kegel, 2002/05/14